A study on Perceived Over-Qualification, Job Satisfaction and Job Stress of Large Scale and Medium Scale Industries Executives with Reference to Sangli ,Kolhapur and Satara M.I.D.C. Area.

 

V.V. Bidnur and R.D. Patil

Faculty, BVDU, Institute of Management and Rural Development Administration-Sangli

*Corresponding Author E-mail: vsbidnur@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

The present study assessed the relationship of Perceived Over-qualification, Job Satisfaction and Job Stress of MNC executives. The samples constituted of 52 executives who were randomly selected from different large scale and medium scale industries Executives with reference to Sangli and Kolhapur and Satara M.I.D.C. area

It has been inferred from the statistical analysis that Perceived Over-qualification, was found to be negatively related to Job Satisfaction. But Perceived Over-qualification, was not found to have any relationship either with  Health Status or the Job Stress of the Executives. The study finds that women executives’ experience more Job Stress than men, but men report poor Health Status than women.

 

KEYWORDS: Perceived Over-qualification, Job Satisfaction, Job Stress.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

All firms, whether they are directly involved in foreign markets or not, are exposed to international competitive forces that can have serious consequences for both survival and performance. To successfully manage an international corporation, it requires an understanding of complex economic, political and governmental issues and an appreciation for the fact that there are differences in how these issues may affect a firm across various nations (Glowinkowski and Copper, 1987). To serve this purpose the whole gamut of employees of industries need to be well equipped and should have the zest and willingness to toil. Thus working in a industry corporation brings in stress and consequently jaded bodies and minds. Companies expect more from less and pressure inevitably falls on employees. To figure out the factors that lead to better performance of the employees, extensive research is needed. To better the performance, an understanding of what factors affect the performance of the employees is important. A number of studies have supported the impact of Job Satisfaction, Job Stress and Somatization on the performance of employees.

 

Perceived Over qualification is also one of the factors that is expected to have an impact on work life of people (Feldan, Doennghaus and Jurnley, 1995) Perceived Over qualification is defined as the extent to which an employed individual perceives that he or she possesses surplus job qualification or has limited opportunities to acquire and use new job related skills. Perceived Over qualification is said to exist when individuals perceive that they possess education, experience or skill that exceed the required job requirements. It may stem froma lack of promotional opportunities associated with the job, which leads to dead ends (Green, Intosh and Vignoles, 1999). In everyday language it is common to state that a certain occupation requires a certain level of education. In such a simple picture of such a relationship between education and work it is implicitly assumed that jobs of a worker with lower qualification: the productivity of the latter is zero. On the other hand people with higher qualifications than required for the job they have are thought to fully waste their abundant qualification: their productivity in a job below their educational level equals the productivity of worker with an adequate educational background for this kind of job (Feldman, 1996). Job satisfaction is defined as a positive feeling about one’s job resulting from an evaluation of its characteristics (Robins and Timothy, 2007). Jude, Thoresen and Bono conducted a study job performance and job satisfaction and they found out that both are highly correlated. The dimensions of job satisfaction identified by the researchers are nature of the work, pay, promotion opportunities, supervision and coworkers (Smith, Kentall and Hullin, 1969). Studies on job satisfaction has found that job characteristics and job complexity mediates the relationship between personality and job satisfaction (Timothy, Bono and Edvin, 2000). Wages and salaries are recognized to be a significant but cognitively complex (Shawn and Ronald, 1996)) and multi dimensional factor in job satisfaction (Timoty, 1993). There is considerable empirical evidence that one of the major reasons employee give for quitting a company is that their supervisor does not care about them (Marcus and Coffman, 1999). There is also evidence of a positive relationship between job satisfaction and life satisfaction (Tait, Padgett and Baldwin, 1989), and that the conditions of the causality is that the people who are satisfied with their lives tend to find more satisfaction in their work (Jude and Wantanabe, 1993) Somatizaton is the presence of at least four medically unexplained somatic symptoms during the past 6 months. Somatization by definition has two components:1) an absence of underlying pathology for which a specific treatment that can be administered, and 2)a conviction by the patient that there must be a specific treatment that can and should be recommended. Typically, there are underlying feelings of depression, anxiety or other feelings, which are not recognized or acknowledge by the person instead, what the person may be aware is all the physical correlates of these underlying difficulties. Anxiety and depression had direct effects on somatic symptoms in somatoform disordered patients (Koh 2008). Stress is a dynamic condition in which an individual is confronted with an opportunity, demand, or resource related to what the individual desires and for which the outcome is perceived to be both uncertain and important (Shuler,1980). The stimulus causing the stress is said to be the stressor. Job Stress is a chronic state caused by a condition in the work place that negatively affects an individual’s performance and overall well being of the body and mind (Ahmad and James, 1991). One or more of a host of physical and mental illness manifests Job Stress. In some cases Job Stress can be disabling. In the early stages Job Stress can ‘rev up’ the body and enhance performance in the work place, thus the term ‘I perform better under pressure’. However if this condition is allowed to go unchecked and the body is revved up further, the performance ultimately declines and the persons health degenerates. Studies by / organizational psychologist found that job performance is at its highest when employees under a medium level of stress (Branthwaite and Ross, 1988). The sign of Job Stress vary from person to person, depending on the particular situation, how long the individual has been subjected to the stressors, and the intensity of the stress itself. In a study on IT professionals, it has found that women experienced higher levels of stress and being overworked. Women professionals appeared to be more sensitive to the total number of elements in the work environment that were changing (total amount of change) as a precursor to stress. (Gallivant, 2003). The most visible causes of work place stress are: Task demands, physical demands of a job, role demands, workplace culture, interpersonal demands, personal or family problems (Robbins and Timothy, 2007). Another important factor which leads to job stress is job instability and other job characteristics like job demand, job control etc. Job demand is positively correlated with job stress (Wallgren 2007). The study focuses on various factors that play a major role in the work life of executives of various MNCs. Many a time the employers find it difficult to keep the employees satisfied. This is one of the serious problems faced by the Organizational Behavior Researches. Hence arises the importance of relating certain factors that hampers the work life of employees. The expansion of educational provision in the last few decades has left too many highly qualified people. Thus the labor market has entrants who are over educated for the jobs they hold. Since over education is one of the determinants of Perceived Over-qualification,  the study gains importance. The impact of Perceived Over-qualification, on Job Satisfaction, health status and Job Stress is assessed in the study.

 

HYPOTHESIS:

i. There will be a significant relationship between Perceived Over-qualification, Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress.

ii. Men and Women executives of MNCs may not differ in terms of Perceived Over-qualification,, Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress.

 

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:

a)      Sample:

Fifty-two executives working in MNCs of which twenty-six were Men and twenty-six were women. They were taken on a random order from the large scale and medium scale Industries Executives with reference to Sangli, Kolhapur and Satara M.I.D.C. area.

b)      Tools:

Perceived Over-qualification, questionnaire developed by Morrow (1991) was used to measure Perceived Over-qualification. The questionnaire consists of both positively and negatively phrased statements. The Job Satisfaction Scale designed by Gayatridevi and Velayudhan. A (2008) was used to measure Job Satisfaction. The scale consists of 75 items, positively and negatively phrased statements pertaining to Self-Esteem, Work-Schedule and Interpersonal Relationship. The reliability of Self-Esteem, Work-Schedule and Interpersonal Relationship are .72, .79, 81 and .84 respectively. The Job stress variable was measured with the 19 items checklist developed by Derogatis, Lipman, Rickels, Uhlenhuth, and Covi (1974) the check list reflects a psychological self-report on symptoms of depression. The 19 items pertained to the frequency of problems or complaints, such as headaches, feelings of low energies, and worrying too much about things. The response ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal) .The check list has a reliability of .90. The workplace stress scale was used to measure Job Stress. The scale was developed by the Martin Company and the American Institute (2001) which consists of 8 items. The response was given on a 5-point scale that ranges from ‘Never’ to ‘Very Often’.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

Table 1 show that Perceived Over-qualification, is found to have a negative correlation with all the four variables of Job Satisfaction. The present job scenario gives the picture that getting into a job is not an easy task, and against this backdrop the relevance of Perceived Over-qualification, seems to diminish. But once in a job one may perceive that his education, experience or skill exceed the job requirement or he or she may see new career prospects ahead that makes present job less satisfying.

 

Table-1: Relationship between Perceived Over-qualification and Job Satisfaction

Variable

‘r’

Perceived Over-qualification,

Self - esteem

0.53*

Perceived Over-qualification,

Work schedule

0.52*

Perceived Over-qualification,

Security

0.46*

Perceived Over-qualification,

Interpersonal relationship

0.48*

 

A study conducted by Kaiser (2002) revealed that higher education attainment is negatively correlated with Job satisfaction which is relevant to the present finding. Another study conducted by Feldan,Doennghaus and Jurnley (1995) found Perceived Over-qualification,  as a factor affecting work life of people. Even though today’s organizations try to make the best out of their men, the employees are found to experience a significant amount of Perceived Over-qualification and this in turn influences Job Satisfaction. The perception of Over-qualification  may be attributed to over education. As the government policies have made higher education cheaper and more available, it is being availed by a large number. So the number of highly qualified goes on increasing and this indeed makes it difficult for them to find jobs that suit their qualification and may finally end up in a job that requires less skill. Hartog (2000) found that Overeducation is generally regarded as the special indicator of the imperfect allocation on the labor market. Perceived Over-qualification,  may also stem from lack of promotional opportunities associated with the job, which leads to dead end, which indeed leads to low Job Satisfaction. In a study conducted by Smith,Kendall andHullin (1969) have identified nature of the work, pay, promotion opportunities, supervision and co-workers as a various dimension of Job Satisfaction. Warr (1987) proposed that people are likely to perceive opportunities for skill utilization when they encourage using skills they have and acquire new skills.

 

Table-2: Relationship between Perceived Over-qualification, with Job Stress

Variable

‘r’

Perceived Over-qualification,

0.21

Perceived Over-qualification,  Job Stress

0.21

 

Table-2 shows the correlation of Perceived Over-qualification and Job Stress. The result shows that Perceived Over-qualification, is not related to and also Job Stress. Depression and anxiety play a major role in stress,  the fact that perceived over-qualification doesn’t have a role in making a person anxious or depressed seems to back up the above finding. Koh (2008) examined the relationship between depressions, anxiety in somatic disordered patients and found that both anxiety and depression had direct effects on somatic symptoms in somatoform disordered patients. One of the factors that lead to Job Stress is the high demand for performance; since Over-qualification,  is one of the determinants of Perceived Over-qualification,  and the perception that one is overqualified reduce the pressure on ones performance. Perceived Over-qualification,  may not add to Job Stress. Job instability is another factor that leads to Job Stress, Perceived Over-qualification,  makes a person shift from one job to another, and thus job stability no longer puts them in stress. Wallgren (2007) conducted a study to test the relationship between job characteristics (job demand, job control) and job stress. The results show that job demand was positively related to job stress. Perceived Over-qualification,  gives a person the feeling that the job he holds is a meager one; this makes the person least bothered about his performance. Thus the hypothesis 1 is partially accepted.

 

Table-3: Mean, SD and ‘t’ value of Perceived Over-qualification, , and Job Stress of executives.

Variable

Group

Mean

S.D.

‘t’ value

Perceived Over-qualification,

Male

Female

25.24

27.75

6.53

6.29

1.40

Job Satisfaction Self esteem

Male

Female

61.52

54.40

12.87

16.53

1.72

Work schedule

Male

Female

118.84

109.29

14.94

14.52

2.33*

Security

Male

Female

36.04

33.37

7.109

6.55

1.40

Inter-personal Relationship

Male

Female

53.92

47.22

13.73

11.17

1.93

Job Stress

Male

Female

15.96

18.44

4.58

3.58

2.18*

 

Table 3 shows that men and women do not differ in the Perception of Over-qualification but differ in other variables such as Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress. This findings reveal that Sex difference do not bring a change in the perception of Over-qualification. It may also attribute that since men and women can avail the same kind of education they may perceive over qualification to the same extent. The‘t’ test results from the table 3 shows that there is a significant difference between the men and women with regard to their satisfaction with work schedules they have. This finding leaves room to think that men differ from women in the way they like their jobs in terms of schedule. This difference may be attributed to the marked difference between the sexes’ perception of hours of work, extended working condition etc.

 

CONCLUSION:

The results also indicate that Self-esteem, Security, Interpersonal Relationship was not found to show any significant difference among male and female executives. It is a well known fact that working in industries enhances Self esteem for both men and women, similarly male and female executives feel secure as working in a industries. India gives more security than in any western country. Interpersonal Relationship is one of the significant factors which industries thrust on its executives, thus the satisfaction derived through Interpersonal Relationship could be of the same level for both male and female executives. The table also indicates that men and women differ in terms of job stress. Women‘s health status is found to be better than that of men. This shows that men are having more frequent temper outburst, headaches, feeling of being trapped, low energy and other health related problems. Men holding more responsibilities in their work settings may affect their health. In the group women are found to experience more Job Stress than men. It may be due to their dual role between family and work commitments, role conflict, and lack of emotional ventilation, job instability, technology and physical demands and sensitivity. In a study by Gallivan, 2003 it has been found that women professionals appeared to be more sensitive to the total number of elements in the work environment that were changing (total amount of change) as a precursor to stress. But men seem to have more chances to refresh themselves and to share their emotions and also comparatively more free than women in household involvements in an India. The perceived over qualification negatively affects Job Satisfaction of MNC Executives. It affects neither health status nor the Job Stress of the Executives. Women executives experience more Job Stress than men, but men report poor health status than women.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Ahmad, S. and James, J. (1991). Organizational Role Stress: A Psychological Study of Middle Managers, Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies. 7, 43-48.

2.       Branthwaite, A. and Ross, A. (1988). Satisfaction and Job Stress in General Practice. Farm Pract, 5, 83-93.

3.       Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H and Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A selfreport Symptom Inventory. Behavioural  Science. 19, 1-15.

4.       Feldman, D.C (1996). The Nature, Antecedents and Convergence of Underemployment.Journal of Management. 22, 385-407.

5.       Feldan, O.C., Doennghaus, A. and Jurnley, W.H. (1995). Underemployement among Recent College Graduates. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 16, 691-706.

6.       Gallivant, M. (2003). Examining gender differences in IT professionals’ perceptions of job stress in response to technological change. Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research.10-23

7.       Glowinkowski, S.P. and Copper, C.L.(1987). Managers and Professionals in Business Individual settings: The Research Evidence. Hayworlth Press, New York.

8.       Green, F., McIntosh, S., and Vignoles, A. (1999).Overeducation and skills- Classifying the Concepts, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, 435, London School of Economics.

9.       Robbins, S.P and Timothy, A. J (2007) Organizational Behaviour (12th ed), Prentice Hall: New Jersey.

10.     Schuler, R. S (1980). Definition and Conceptualization of Stress in Organizations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance.

11.     Shawn, M.C and Ronald, B.M (1996). Cognitive Complexity and the Perceived Dimensionalityof Pay Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 81. 102-109.

12.     Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M and Hulin, C.L (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Rand McNally, Chicago. Tait, M., Padgett, M.Y. and Baldwin, T.T (1989). Job and Life Satisfaction: A Reevaluation of Strength of the Relationship and Gender Effects as the Function of the Date of the Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 748.

13.     Timothy, A.J (1993) Validity of Dimensions of Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire: Evidence of Differential Prediction. Personnel psychology. 331-355.

14.     Timothy, A. J., Bono, J.E. and Edwin, A. L.(2000) Personality and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.

15.     Wallgren,L.G (2007) Job characteristics, Motivators and Stress among information technology consultants. International Journal of  Ergonomics, 37, 51-59.

16.     Warr, P. (1987) Work unemployment and Mental health, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

 

 

 

Received on 08.04.2011                    Accepted on 07.05.2011        

©A&V Publications all right reserved

Asian J. Management 2(3): July-Sept., 2011 page 104-107